Could we at least get the bug fixes pushed into suckless repo? I don't think Jaromil has introduced the bloat yet.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Marc André Tanner <m...@brain-dump.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:54:19AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> On 16 May 2016 at 23:22, Marc André Tanner <m...@brain-dump.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:27:40PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: >> >> I think the vis editor alone is enough bloat in the suckless >> >> repositories. >> > >> > I don't know what vis has to do with the original thread, nonetheless >> > it would be interesting to know which aspects of vis you consider >> > bloated? >> >> I can only imagine he meant sandy which I would suggest to be removed asap. > > In principle sandy is a fine editor, it has a few nice ideas (doing > as much as possible with external tools, the prompt handling, a very > simplistic approach to syntax highlighting etc.) and should be > positioned as a simpler nano. It also has various limitations which > I deemed unacceptable for vis, but they are mostly there by design > as a result of its simplicity. > > My main critique concerns the introduction of vi like key bindings, > which seem bolted on and in my opinion do not fit its design at all. > Adding them was a mistake. > > -- > Marc André Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: 10C93617 >
