On Thu, 12 May 2016 17:59:40 +0200 hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > you guys are arrogant but still sheep. you can create as much elitist > software as you want, you have no chance to be interoperable with > every real-world system that we need access to. > > as much as i hate the cheesy term (i find it ridiculous to hint > towards something so obvious, but you "noobs" manage to prove me > wrong), you also don't even get "suckless". it doesn't mean running > pure code exclusively like RMS does. > > we demand a certain amount of pragmatism, cause the way towards > perfection can by definition not be the goal. elegant workarounds, > practical alternatives, sane preselection of ressources, interfaces, > apis are needed. and the things we interface are not only dwm window > managers or shitty terminal emulators made to run ncurses > applications.
suckless strives for perfection in an environment where most people are illiterate. We are like a book club in india, but just because we literate while the majority is illiterate it doesn't mean that we are doing something wrong. We may not be a big force, but at least we're heading in the right direction. -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
