you seem to prepare writing your own operating system, but there is already losethos, i don't recommend redoing this fine work.
On 4/20/16, k...@shike2.com <k...@shike2.com> wrote: >> inline assembly is irrelevant and not needed. > > This is my way of thinking, because if you need asm, then your code is > not portable at all, and then it is better to move the asm to a > function and coded it directly in asm in a .as file. I am open to > discuss it, because I can understand a few cases where you cannot call > an asm function, for example disabling interrupts while you don't have > a stack or you don't want to trust the current stack. Usually, in the > majority of these cases is better to code it directly everything in > assembler, but you can find the cases where not. For this reason, I > am open to discuss it, but only in a totallly stupid way, pass the inline > directly to the assembler, and without any relation to the c code. > > What is your opinion guys? > > Regard, > > >
