> Flash is very much a technical problem. Binary blob, catastrophic > security record, X11 support is a giant hack (render a window on top of > the page), absolutely non-portable outside of a few common > OS+architecture combinations, want me to go on?
I don't care about flash at all. I just reported a problem I found. Worthy answers could have been: 1. dwm is deliberately not supporting flash apps. 2. Ditto but this may point to another underlying problem. 3. You will have to contribute a patch yourself if you want it fixed. Instead you decided to brag about "what I deserve". I'm not 15 years old. I've been using and patching dwm and other suckless tools since many years and I'm very happy with them, it's just that I don't need to publicly validate my suckless zealotry at every opportunity. I'm stopping this here because I don't want to further annoy other users. So you have the last word. Cheers -- Carlos
