On 6 March 2016 at 13:47, robin <robin.a.t.peder...@gmail.com> wrote: > Microkernels defenitely resonates with the unix philosophy "do one thing and > do it well". > Having everything, except FUSE and such, in the kernel is doing more than > one thing.
IMHO the architectural decision for a monolith (==static linkage) often reduces the management bloat of dynamic loading or similar "extension" approaches that you end up with in a microkernel architecture. I would rather say that your actual architecture in a sense of code structure and separation of concerns is the key to suckless, than favouring something similar to dynamic linkage. -Anselm
