On 2 March 2016 at 18:26, Maxime Coste <frrr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I'd really like to get rid of boost, and possibly migrate to a
> lighter regex lib. The problem is that no currently available libs match
> the required feature set
Thanks for the list of issues. Perhaps we can work these in to a library.
> * support lookaheads and lookbehinds, until I find a clean, alternative way
> to express 'a double quote that is not preceeded by a pair number of
> antislash' to match the closers of C strings (as an example of their
> current usage)
How about,
"([^\\"]|\\.)*"
cls
