On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:59:41AM +0000, Raphaël Proust wrote: > On 28 February 2016 at 17:20, Greg Reagle <greg.rea...@umbc.edu> wrote: > > I get these results: The first version works fine. The second version > > shows error "?changes not in sequence" and does nothing. > > There is a difference between acme's handling. It prints a warning but > also does some changes which are mangled.
That's interesting. It's funny that sam does a better job since acme is a successor to sam. I wonder if/how they share code.
