On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 18:05:58 +0100 Kamil Cholewiński <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Wouldn't you need a service supervisor with at's > > functionallity? > > No. Separation of concerns. > > > If you are paranoid about sat crashing > > When in doubt, assume the component will crash/fail. > > > as long as you can have user-private services. > > Yes, please let's stop writing process management code > into daemons and instead solve this problem in a portable > and non-sucky way. I'm not sure I understand that you are suggesting.
pgpV9OjpKiYm_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
