Jack L. Frost wrote: > Agreed that the way patches are being named right now is confusing. Dates > and/or refs in the name would be very much appreciated.
Heyho, I make the following proposal: Use shortrefs for the filename, but use dates on the wikipage or at least annotate the hyperlink with the date. Then you can quickly see how old a patch is and estimate how much work it would be to update it to the current HEAD. Also thanks to the shortref in the filename you can easily find the commit where it definitely worked to have a starting point for bisection if there are any problems after updating the patch to current HEAD. --Markus
