Martti: i tend to agree, but i wonder if that's not already how the
dwm wiki is being used at this moment. perhaps i don't get the
difference, or the addition you're proposing.

On 11/6/15, Martti Kühne <mysat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Reading what hiro had to say about the topic makes it sound as if we
> just needed a wiki "pastebin" section that has built-in "archiving"
> (git rm) feature that builds on git's built-in feature of preserving
> history.
> Maybe we could write clients that don't give a shit whether such an
> entry was archived and BAM - problem solved?
>
> cheers!
> mar77i
>
>

Reply via email to