Martti: i tend to agree, but i wonder if that's not already how the dwm wiki is being used at this moment. perhaps i don't get the difference, or the addition you're proposing.
On 11/6/15, Martti Kühne <mysat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Reading what hiro had to say about the topic makes it sound as if we > just needed a wiki "pastebin" section that has built-in "archiving" > (git rm) feature that builds on git's built-in feature of preserving > history. > Maybe we could write clients that don't give a shit whether such an > entry was archived and BAM - problem solved? > > cheers! > mar77i > >