On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 06:45:05PM +0200, Markus Teich wrote: > Ross Mohn wrote: > > Yes, I'd like to send these just to hackers@, where they belong > > Heyho Ross, > > I don't think hackers@ was the right choice. It was a support question, > neither > a patch nor a discussion about a proposed patch or even an actual bug report > of > a bug in dvtm. Your problem (getting cwd of an arbitrary process) has also > been > discussed on dev@ in the past.
That highlights my frustration with the new definitions for the mailing lists. I am a hacker/developer and really only ask a question when I need a little help hacking on the code. As you can see, my question led me to submit the patched solution in the same email thread. The changed definitions "keep the development out of the endless support threads on dev@ and development more enjoyable." My question was a development question, not a support question, and therefore was more appropriately discussed on hackers@. Why "support" is discussed on "dev[elopment]" and not on a new support@ list is still beyond me, but I'll get over it as soon as Marc shows up on hackers@. :-) Thanks! -Ross
