On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:00:35PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > > > We are ignoring return value of dup(), so just remove it. > > > From dup(3): > > The dup() system call creates a copy of the file descriptor oldfd, > using the lowest-numbered unused descriptor for the new descriptor. > >
Yes, but can't dup() fail? Shouldn't we at least check or that? Ciao, Markus
