We should seriously discuss this and settle down to a consistent guideline, agreed.
On June 1, 2015 5:33:03 PM CEST, Joerg Jung <m...@umaxx.net> wrote: >On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:14:17PM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Joerg Jung <m...@umaxx.net> wrote: >> >> From the average suckless user's view, knowing what source is >compiled >> and what config included is always wanted and preferred over other >> people's builds. >> > >Average suckless user... I hope this one does not exist. :) >However, you can still check the source with/of a build. > >There are people who prefer compiling from latest git source and others >prefer releases and using packages based on these releases. > >Actually, the whole discussion came up several times on this list and >in >the past, releases were provided for most of the suckless projects. > >Is this changing now? I'm fine with this, but then the workflow will >change for package maintainers and they might start rolling own >releases. > >Regards, >Joerg
