On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:58:49 +0200 Mattias Andrée <maand...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
Hey Mattias, > Well it was on the list of software you needed, > so I thought I could help out. (So no, it is not > a NIH-timewaster.) > > I have not spent too much time researching the > area. (But I assumed you had.) The best solution > to the problem that I know if is bugseverywhere, > but I think it is poorly designed and last time > I used it, it was very buggy. I guess one could > build a solution around it but I think that would > be a half-assed solution. > > The entry in 'project ideas' as not very > descriptive of what is needed, but I thought > that addressed later. Please don't CC the mail to me directly, the ml doesn't work like this here. ;) @topic: The software list is hopelessly outdated in many parts (I just removed a request to port stuff to bionic libc, which was an obvious DoA a few months ago). Please again tell me what it does better than bugseverywhere than only being less bug-ridden. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
