On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 05:28:02PM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 18:10:09 +0100 > "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k...@shike2.com> wrote: > > > NOTREACHED is the traditional comment and it is understood by dozen of > > lint incarnations (although I guess gcc ignores it), so my vote is to > > keep NOTREACHED.
I prefer NOTREACHED as well in the same spirit as FALLTHROUGH. This is what the style guide suggests too. It is not really a big deal though. Either way I'd like to minimize the instances where this is needed in the first place.
