Hi! I recently added qutebrowser to the "rocks" page and it was subsequently removed[1]. I accept that, though it raises a few questions:
Is that page for software (more or less) adhering to the suckless
philosophy, or is it (or at least the "application" section) about
things *working well with dwm* like the introduction suggests?
Programs
========
Some programs work well with dwm. Some general rules of thumb
for judging a programs as usable are: [...]
If it's the former and (at least according to the log of removed stuff
in general) this is mostly about the language something is implemented
in:
Why are Firefox addons (Vimperator/VimFX) written in
Coffescript/Javascript considered suckless? Or if you want to go even
further: Why is there stuff in there using glib (in a non-GTK
context)? After all that's listed on the top of sucks.md ;)
Florian
[1]
http://git.suckless.org/sites/commit/?id=284b21b338012907e233dff549ddc78a4ba3b78b
--
http://www.the-compiler.org | m...@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP)
GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc
I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
pgpD4z5E2EbtG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
