On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:45:29 +0100 k...@shike2.com wrote: Hey k0ga,
> Yes, I speak about static linking, because It is what we have in > sbase, so dynamic linking is outside of this discussion (ant it is > not suckless :P). And maybe compilers are smarters, but the link > process is the same. Try it and you will see it. Even if you find > some too much smart linker that does it, you are doing something > wrong and requiring a more complex toolchain. I hope we will > not have to implement this kind of linkers some day ;). > > Again, try it. just for the record, as discussed in IRC you are right about it. Apparently, compilers are not as smart as I had in mind previously. Going the separate approach is a good thing, so I welcome this suggestion! Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
