On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 06:40:59PM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > PATCH 4: As already discussed style(9) is the reference for future code > changes. Given the codebase hasn't already been transformed, I > did it.
Although I think sticking to a specific style going forward is reasonable (even if I'm not fond of all of the recommendations of style(9)), I don't think refactoring the existing dwm codebase purely for style is a good idea. When I looked at the patches, the first thing that came to my mind is "All my dwm patches are going to break because they can no longer be cleanly applied." Customization-by-patching is a very popular strategy with dwm users, and I'm sure there are tons of other people this change would also inconvenience. Eric
