On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Alexander Huemer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:35:52PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote: > > > There is the http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page > > > > llvm/clang is worse than gcc as it's from the start a massive c++ kludge. At > > least with gcc until its version 4.7, you can bootstrap its compilation > > with a > > C "only" compiler. > > Indeed, that fact isn't nice about clang.
That fact is a definitive nono. I would reconsidere if re-written in C. I'm stuck with gcc 4.7.x -- Sylvain
