Hi, I read in the suckless site and I'm interested about statically linked executables and replace glibc.
My questions are: - Why clibc? Most of distros that don't use glibc, use musl. - Why mksh as shell? -- Henrique Lengler
Hi, I read in the suckless site and I'm interested about statically linked executables and replace glibc.
My questions are: - Why clibc? Most of distros that don't use glibc, use musl. - Why mksh as shell? -- Henrique Lengler