On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:10:42PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:29:13AM -0500, M Farkas-Dyck wrote: > > I'm not sure, but some in this community are hacking morpheus [1], > > which is much alike. > > > > [1] http://morpheus.2f30.org/ > > The project is currently losing traction because we lack the manpower > to implement what is required. This is the only project in my knowledge that > has attempted to implement some of the core features of stali. > > The most limiting factor is the lack of tools and options in sbase and ubase.
What do you guys think about toybox? One could probably argue that there is too much magic going on behind the scenes (parsing comments for command line arguments/help output etc.). On the plus side it simplifyies the code quite a bit. The tools can be both built into a single executable as well as into individual binaries. The design philosophy seems reasonable. http://landley.net/code/toybox/design.html Cheers, -- Marc André Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0
