On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:30:56PM -0700, Evan Gates wrote: > Yes it does, but it's a horrible piece of code that desperately needs > to be rewritten from the ground up along with pcw[0] and cw (in the > pcw project). I haven't touched them in a long time because they work > well enough for me when using ii. You have been warned.
I like srw; thanks for making it. The only things from libreadline that I miss are tab completion and history navigation. In particular, I like libreadline's ^R reverse search, but I can survive without it since it's not often that I'll want to repeat things in IRC. Eric
