On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 07:31:09PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > I just noticed that "%F" support in strftime is a C99 feature, and if > sic is targeting C89, it should be changed to "%Y-%m-%d". Either way, > this changes the time format from the original %D, but I strongly favor > ISO 8601 and think it makes more sense to use it as the default since > unlike MM/DD/YY and DD/MM/YY, there is no ambiguity in interpretation.
Sorry for the double post, but I'd like to add that I would also argue it is more in line with the Unix philosophy (and therefore more in-line with suckless.org's goals) as well since it makes it easier to use logged output with other utilities i.e. sort(1). Eric
