On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:24:00 +0200 (CEST) Norman Köhring <ko...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> Not so much. I tried it with an image, which should be quite nice to compress > (quite uniform, dark colours). Here for you to compare: > > 632K image.png > 5.5M image.simpleimageformat How did you convert it. Did I miss something? :D > 607K image.lzma /* lzma --best --extreme … */ > 608K image.xz /* xz --best --extreme … */ > 931K image.gz /* gzip --best … */ > 578K image.bz2 /* bzip2 --best … */ > 1.1M image.lz4 /* lz4 -9 … */ Thanks for the list. BZ2 seems like the best way to go ;). > Last one is super fast in compression. bzip2 feels quite slow already. XZ and > LZMA are super slow. All are fast in decompression. It's all about decompression, so a little overhead in compression is ok. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
