> Because if so, there are many many cases where there is no > precombined version in unicode, so you have to use the combining > characters.
Yeah, of course, there are a lot of them. The point here is if these cases are common or not. All the characters that I use can be written with unicode characters. > > > characters really seems to be a hassle to support: variable terminal > > > line, potentially more than twice as long as they actually are > > > > I have a similar feeling, but I am not sure about this. > > I am coming at this from a selfish "I likely won't do the work" > standpoint, but I think full and accurate support of Unicode is well > worth working towards. I think all the people here think like you. Regards, -- Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
