On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:01 PM, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:47:27 +0200 > "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k...@shike2.com> wrote: > >> I agree with you and I like the patch. If nobody have problems with >> it I will apply it. > > Cool! :) > > Yeah, it's the first step on refactoring the main loop. I see some > potential.
A problem seems to have appeared! This patch creates an st that is unusably slow for me. Using the coarse clock doesn’t seem to help either. Is anyone else experiencing the same behaviour? It’s definitely 738f555f→5edeec1b, and judging by the processor time, it’s an issue of inefficiency rather than, say, sleeping for too long.
