On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:03:28 +0200 Sylvain BERTRAND <sylw...@legeek.net> wrote:
> This is where we disagree. You draw the line there: acceptance of > the technical cost of make in your SDKs whatever the size. > I guess, I draw the line somewhere else, damned! Says the guy who puts #This is a brutal makefile... but extremely easy to read as it is actually #very basic makefile logic. on top of a 450 LOC makefile[0]. Dr. Frankenstein would be impressed! > Install windows and visual studio then. Subscribe to msdn. That > argument is invalid. Don't accept "common" practice blindly like > a "fanatic" :). I'm talking about common practice in the scope of suckless software development, not in the sense of software development in general. If you really believed in GNU/Freedom(R), you would never even talk about Microsoft. You've been unmasked! > Then, you'll think I'm stupid, and I'll think you are stupid. > Welcome in the human world. With the difference that I'm not the only one here who thinks your makefile-concept is stupid. > Oh! "writing portable makefile" did pop up. Could you explain > me why it relates to this topic? Yes, because your points aren't. Cheers FRIGN [0]: https://github.com/sylware/mudev/blob/master/makefile -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
