Am 24.06.2014 16:46, schrieb Eric Pruitt:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:33:10PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
However, I favor Martti's verson, which is just plain genius:
CEIL(x) ((int)(x) + ((x) > 0))
Perhaps I'm missing something here, but this completely fails whenever
(x) is already a whole number
On 2014-06-24 Jakob Kramer wrote:
> Finally, I don't think that reimplementing a function that already is
> in the standard library for "more efficiency" makes any sense.
> Correctness is most important, and I rather trust my C library
> implementation on that.
