On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 06:32:50PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:31:47 +0100 > Dimitris Papastamos <s...@2f30.org> wrote: > > > uint_least64_t is C99. > > Well, it's your choice to take it or not. If you don't like it, you can > implement the changes to the inherent variable-declarations in the > middle of blocks only to at least get the separation right.
I don't understand. I will accept some of your changes without reverting to C90. stdint.h and inttypes.h are *not* C90. declaring variables in the middle of the block is not my practice. I am not embracing all features of C99, I use a mix of C90 and C99 without sacrificing portability (as far as I can).
