On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:34:18 -0500 Eric Pruitt <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would think so as well, but I've been wrong before; apparently > breaking color compatibility with practically every other terminal with > 256 color support [is a feature][1], so some commentary from one of the > official / core maintainers would be nice. My commentary: The other terminals don't set the "standard", and if, most of the time, standards suck. What do you define by "color compatibility" anyway? Do you take a screenshot of your terminal and compare it with ones from other terminals? It's about predictability (imho, all other terminals overcomplicate color-management). And that's why I agree on the "copy"-part, which definitely needs to be fixed, as the software behaves unpredictably. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <[email protected]>
