On 18/04/2014, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > I checked out some of them and > the according POSIX-specification[0] and wondered how much work it > would be to reimplement it and, of course, if there is any reason to do > so.
Too much work, no good reason. We already have mksh. > The main issue we are facing today are the bashisms in many > shell-scripts, which basically override POSIX-compliance. The main issue, actually, is that the POSIX shell language is insane [0]. > Is there any shell to recommend as suckless rc > [0]: > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18
