On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Chris Down <ch...@chrisdown.name> wrote: > Please note that dwm@ and dev@ are the same list -- you sent the same > message twice to the same list. :-)
Bummer. One should think that sending an e-mail ought to be a trivial feat. But Murphy's law strikes as always. > You may wish to apply config changes to config.def.h, not config.h, > since that is not part of the distribution. Duly noted. I can't help but wonder, though: would it not be more intuitive to have patches applied to the configuration that an install actually uses? Why not have a "config.h" in the repository? > Why is keypress renamed to "keypressrelease"? I was thinking of the press and release parts as separate events handled by this function, and named it to reflect that. But yes, I agree that "keyevent" would then be better. And of course, with the physical action in mind, "keypress" is as valid as ever as well. > Best to keep the standard indentation, I think. Indeed. My apologies. I have updated my .vimrc to use actual tabs, and will be mindful of that henceforth. I will push a cleaner version, including the name change to "keyevent" (unless "keypress" is specifically preferred?).
