On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Marc André Tanner <m...@brain-dump.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:17:54 +0100 Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi there, >> > >> > is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days? >> > >> > I just tried to find one, but no luck... >> >> Dtach and dvtm are separate features and both can replace tmux and >> screen. A rewrite of tmux is just wasting resources. > > Actually just a couple of days ago I uploaded a dtach replacement > > http://repo.or.cz/w/abduco.git > > it is so far only lightly tested but I hope that in combination with > dvtm this will serve as a cleaner, simpler, more robust and generally > suckless alternative to tmux/screen. > > Comments welcome.
Question: Can you explain why you coded it? What in dtach(1) didn't you like? Comment: The manpage states > if a given session name starts either with a dot or a forward slash > it is interpreted as a path name and used unmodified i.e. relatively to the > current working directory. That seems a bit surprising. Either the wording and the functionality differ or the functionality is very surprising. I'd expect > if a given session name starts with a forward slash > it is interpreted as an absolute path, if a dot followed > by a slash (./) it is interpreted a relative path. Cheers, -- ______________ Raphaël Proust
