On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:45:33AM -0500, Strake wrote:
> > (either using UTF-8 or UTF-32 indices), right?
>
> I meant Unicodepoints; those are just Unicodecs.
UTF-32 is an encoding that is identical to the unicode point as far as
I know. So what I am thinking is that one would either use the UTF-8
representation of the Unicode point as an index, or the unicode point
itself. Since using UTF-8 would not require any conversion (on UTF-8
locales) I think it would be preferrable.
> > Since mmap needs a file descriptor argument
>
> It's ignored for anonymous map.
The man page I read did not mention an anonymous map. I found an example
on Wikipedia though
anon = (char*)mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_ANON|MAP_SHARED, -1, 0);
that probably means it may not be that portable after all. Thanks for
making me aware of it in any case.
