On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:11:40 +0300 "Alexander S." <alex0pla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't want to start a flame, but C isn't exactly state of the art > language. I shall agree that Go has problems, but why it would be a > disgrace any worse than a living fossil C is? So being old implies it's bad? That's the kind of thinking that makes people try to reinvent something that is already good and then ruin it. We could land a man on the moon with 4K ram, but we can't run a formatted text editor which complies with most standards without 100MB. Most e-mail now contains html because someone thought there was a need to make them pretty. Now you need a whole graphical interface just to read a stupid email from some institution or corporation which thinks that they must "modernize". And even then.. Not saying that C is the holy god of all languages and everything should be in C. Everything has a purpose. Being old doesn't make it bad! -- Raimundo Martins <raimundoomart...@gmail.com>
