On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:26:41PM +0800, Chris Down wrote: > On 2013-10-18 18:08, sin wrote: > > If there is enough reason to include logname, such as existing scripts using > > it etc. then I would not mind adding this to sbase. > > Right, but surely the correct way of doing this in that case is that the > existing scripts should be rewritten?
I guess sure. But then again I am a lazy boy so I don't know.
