On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:56:05PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > > It's runtime segfault (that may be rare and hard to catch) that is > > worth exactly one additional check. > > Ok, we don't agree about this topic, so I would like listen the opinion > of other suckless developers in order to take a decision.
I agree with Roberto here, if a user makes a mistake in the configuration and the program segfaults it is the user's responsibility. I do not think it is hard to catch, all it takes is to diff your config against a known working copy (the default one for example). Thanks, sin
