sbase and 9base overlap a bit on functionality. sbase is better suited for core. though currently it seems you should layer sbase on top of 9base to fulfill some of sbase's TODO's. get porting :)
--Carlos On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Hugues <ypnose.yp...@mailoo.org> wrote: > Le 27-05-2013 20:14, Carlos Torres a écrit : > >> I believe it already has what you need to replace coreutils/busybox. >> though its not just a matter or swapping stuff. you'ld have to port >> all the shell scripts that depend on gnuish stuff. i.e. anything that >> uses the auto* stuff doesn't work with 9base awk and ls... but do you >> really need stuff that uses auto* cruft? > > Hum, I see. I'm not afraid of the shell. > But, you're talking about 9base, it should work better with sbase (even if > gnuish stuff is missing)? > -- > H MoV. >
