On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, at 9:32, Carlos Torres wrote: > I like the seperation of term.c from st.c, I agree that makes reading > st.c clearer. I can't comment on the removal of forward declarations, > typedefs and static vars though the resulting difference is legible as > well. (frankly code in alphabetical order makes me want to sort it > according to code flow and surrounding context...) i think the choice > of using the fontconfig utf8 functions was a good idea. I frowned > when you switched to 'gnu99' from 'c99' (i pictured a lot of flames on > that)
If it _can_ be compiled in c99 mode, no reason it shouldn't be - then people can compile it using LLVM/clang, tendra, pcc, etc. How hard is it going to be to merge these changes with what changes have been made to the main version since he branched off from it?
