On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:25:25AM +0800, Patrick Haller wrote: > On 2013-04-11 21:17, Carlos Torres wrote: > > it was there just a little hidden > > http://git.suckless.org/sites/tree/tools.suckless.org/ii/patches/ii-ipv6.diff > > i mean in the ii repo -> http://git.suckless.org/ii
I agree...I think they should be put into separate branches. It would make rebasing to a newer version ridiculously easy for end users, and managing patches easy as well. I currently do something similar with dwm, I have a branch 'pristine' that tracks origin/master, and a multitude of other branches for different patches with one that I selectively merge to called 'patched' that I use for building. There's no reason to keep patches as patch files in git. Thanks, -- William Giokas | KaiSforza GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF
pgpeO7led0H59.pgp
Description: PGP signature
