[2013-01-05 18:55] Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> > > % ls -hs st-0.3/st > 126K st
I wondered why 20h did not use `du -h st-0.3/st' instead.
Then I wondered why ls(1) has `-s' at all.
Even in 1st Edition Unix, ls(1) has `-s' although du(1) is available.
http://man.cat-v.org/unix-1st/1/ls
http://man.cat-v.org/unix-1st/1/du
Does someone of you have more information on this?
meillo
