I think this works nicely at least for single image editing http://ompldr.org/vYnQ0bw
anyway, khm has the point it's just an example on how to have floating clients it doesnt have to make sense On 27 September 2012 15:15, Nick <suckless-...@njw.me.uk> wrote: > Quoth Samantha Baldwin: > > I disagree, I tend to want hand-control of the windows when I use > > gimp. The default two-tool-window + one-window-per-image format > > doesn't lend itself very well to dwm's tiling scheme, in my opinion. > > Oh, OK, I guess I use gimp differently to others, then. I like to > have all the gimp windows in their own tag, and just let dwm tile > the windows as appropriate. But if lots of other people find it > easier to manage floating, then maybe I was wrong about it being a > bad default. > > Out of curiousity, why do people find manually managing gimp's tool > windows easier? For me the multiple windows makes automatic window > management even more important. I think I'd find gimp quite annoying > without tiling window management. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlBkQ2AACgkQH0hWdATkZT/uuACfWuQh8eO+vePRpMRjdQaeyyQh > ydgAn3UsO4xqa3sQJMLQXhdpDLXdg7ZO > =yNgQ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- *Ivan c00kiemon5ter V Kanakarakis* >:3
