* Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com> [2012-06-06 09:49:02 +0200]: > - binaries do not execute (!) - the Arch GCC bug for musl recently discussed?
you mean the .gnu.hash nonsense? that should not matter for statically linked programs.. if you have contact with the arch packagers then tell them not to hard code --hash-style=gnu into the compiler gnu hash is non-standard and does not make much sense (unless you use broken programs like firefox or openoffice with large amount of symbols in dso outside the main executable for no good reason, then it can be 2x faster to load than standard sysv hash however there is --hash-style=both for situations like that) > -not built in bin: ... why? most of the listed tools are known to work with gcc+musl > ... so compared to the previous glibc (main) branch there are some > serious costs at the moment... > Hopefully the missing functionality can be fixed. > (I will also try to get heirloom static against musl) heirloom tools can be compiled with musl after some minor cleanups > Ps. sorry if this starts to be off topic for the suckless dev list Ds. i suggest sending arch specific complaints to an arch list and musl specific ones to the musl mailing list btw there are various musl based distros https://github.com/rofl0r/sabotage https://github.com/pikhq/bootstrap-linux https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/snowflake
