$ bzr clone http://bazaar.leonerd.org.uk/c/libvterm $ cd libvterm $ ls LICENSE Makefile doc include src t tbl2inc_c.pl vterm.pc.in $ ls src encoding input.c pen.c screen.c unicode.c vterm.c encoding.c parser.c rect.h state.c utf8.h vterm_internal.h
Does that help? --Andrew Hills On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis <eeke...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:25:49 -0400 > Philip Kovac <pko...@cs.uml.edu> wrote: > >> Regarding one of the goals of 'st,' would the suckless crowd be >> interested in resolving the current admitted shortcomings of 'st' by >> rolling in a fairly tiny library called libvterm (bzr repo at >> http://bazaar.leonerd.org.uk/c/libvterm) by Paul 'Leonerd' Evans >> (http://www.leonerd.org.uk) for handling terminal parsing? I know that >> the philosophy of suckless is to generally avoid unnecessary code, but >> in this case libvterm has encapsulated a lot of knowledge about >> terminal behavior that would prevent a large amount of duplication of >> effort. I currently use it in a toy project called x86term >> (https://github.com/pkovac/x86term) which implements a terminal >> emulator on bare x86 iron, the binary size hasn't gotten too large, >> and libvterm allowed me to basically immediately bring it to a usable >> state once the barebones needed were in place. If any of this >> interests the suckless community, the author of libvterm and myself >> both have interest in porting 'st' to it. >> >> Sincerely, >> Philip Kovac >> > > This interests me more than the st project itself but... > >> http://bazaar.leonerd.org.uk/c/libvterm > > Where in that forest of empty dirs is the code? I got an impression of > a dead tree still standing, lol. >
