On 21 February 2012 13:22, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > Greetings. > > Calvin Morrison wrote: >> I have written my own tabbed browser called sb [1], it has cookie >> handling built in very simple and the cookie file is a flat file >> format. This is all done with libsoup. >> >> The code required to do this is minimal, and in my code it took 2 lines [2] >> >> w.jar = soup_cookie_jar_text_new(g_build_filename(g_get_home_dir(), >> DEFAULT_COOKIE_FILE, NULL), FALSE); >> soup_session_add_feature(w.session, SOUP_SESSION_FEATURE(w.jar)); >> >> When I do this I can use multiple processes to access and write to the >> cookies. Logging out in one process will logout me from the website in >> another process using the same site, once I reload the page. > > Why didn't you commit a patch to surf instead of writing your > own?
Because surf is a non-tabbed editor the doesn't seek the same goals as mine? yeah that's probably why. This browser was a weekend project which i spent some time hacking on, not a full browser not intended to be. > Now there is yet another surf clone with a different hand- > ling and yet another crappy intendation style. Thanks for the indentation style input. Luckily I don't have to work with you so i'm not to bothered. As for a surf clone, when did surf become the end all of webkit browsers? my browser is /not/ surf and it's /not/ intended to be. What is your beef? > And btw., »GPLv3 except stuff under MIT/X from surf« – I don't > think such culture bolshevism is legal. Yes the licensing is whatever. I don't really care this isn't intended for any purpose other than personal use. I will continue to use improper licensing practices until someone decides to take legal action against me. I used one or two lines from surf. there is a comment within the code denoting this. Please take your time and sue me or whatever you wish. Can we get a on-topic answer that doesn't spew off-topic rants? Calvin Morrison