On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:49:51 +0000 Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > But, think of the hyphens! > > Not that this should cause any trouble with existing rm > implementations, but you'll never know what syntactic extensions GNU > might come up with for userspace in-rm chroot filesystem hierarchies.
Aboriginal Linux uses Busybox, not GNU coreutils right now. There is also related project maintained by Rob Landley called toybox - main goal is to write simpler (code-wise) BSD-licensed replacement for Busybox. Last weeks toybox mailing list was busy, so I'm looking forward to that. On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:55:50 +0000 Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > Thanks for a great reading. :) > > Do you intend to compile all modules you might use into a single > perl binary? Or just enough to compile stuff, and then stick to > shell scripts and Lisp? I'm not sure if it was great, but I would like to see Stali or something similar moving forward. I compiled just default modules for Perl. Still this is good question, probably Python is more a issue: think Mercurial. btw. I'm more awk type (lua is also nice) ;) On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:59:14 -0500 Kurt H Maier wrote: > > Perl has facilities to easily embed modules. In my opinion, the best > one is staticperl: > Currently I'm exhausted, so this will wait. I have seen too much configure errors, compilation errors, linker errors and make errors, that I was close to mental breakdown. I feel like this guy [1] - it is a great presentation (less than 25 minutes worth spending time) about debugging complex systems. I agree with his remarks that: "It's packaging other people's software that makes system administrators violent people". [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieCTIPG43no
