On 5 February 2012 07:27, Robert Ransom <rransom.8...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2012-02-04, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de <sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: >>> What versions of dwm are you using? >> >> Patched dwm based on changeset 64eb02a74f2b (Tip from end of September >> 2010). > > http://hg.suckless.org/dwm/rev/79fe8e97dcf7 might be the fix (applied > June 2011). > >> Wouldn't bother to apply the fix anyway, but thanks for replying -- I >> couldn't remember discussing such bug on the list. > > I never noticed the patch on the list, but I remember hearing about > the issue on IRC.
What does this mean? The version committed in http://hg.suckless.org/dwm/rev/79fe8e97dcf7 has been slightly improved shortly afterwards to since then to http://hg.suckless.org/dwm/rev/ac3cba181282 Cheers, Anselm
