Hi Davide, On 14 December 2011 17:01, Davide Anchisi <danch...@gmail.com> wrote: > wmii can come in many "flavours": > bash, plan9, python, ruby > but I have no expertise to compare them. > > When I came to use wmii, some years ago, after a while I chose to use it > through the plan9 wmiirc, thinking that it was more in the logic of the wmii > project, and that it let a higher degree of configuration. But I don't know > if this is true, and the /usr/local/plan9 folder is more then 200 Mb on my > hard disk. > > Which are the advantages of one flavour over the other? Which are the pros > and cons? Why and how to chose one over the other? > > Does it make sense to compare them considering usability, flexibility and > control possibilities, easiness of configuration, architectural elegance and > logical consistency? > And of course their needs for resources (e.g, memory usage, hard disk space, > cpu load). > > Thanks for suggestions and insights,
The only wmii flavour I can recommend is available at the following link: http://dwm.suckless.org/ Best regards, Anselm
