On 1 November 2011 16:57, Sime Ramov <s...@ramov.com> wrote: > * Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> [2011-11-01 16:49+0100]: >> (i) It features a kind of 'static' window management model in the >> tradition of ion/wmi(i)/i3. > > And that is exactly why I use it. It has perfect balance between dynamic > and manual tiling.
Fair enough. >> (ii) The IPC mechanism reminds me of all the mistakes I made in wmi >> (with wmiremote) and later wmii with wmiir/libixp. > > Conceptually or? I am not a programmer but I prefer server/client > software model. Having an IPC mechnism to control and configure your WM makes the code unnecessary more complex. Client-Server rarely makes sense if there is only one client and one server. Cheers, Anselm
