On 1 November 2011 11:11, Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I disagree, setting a particular layout implicitly because some random > window says it is in fullscreen state is not a great idea imho.
By making one client fullscreen we're already effectively doing this. We're just making the other windows invisible, too. That seems to me to be even worse. > I don't understand this. Cycling through any kind of windows is > monitor specific already, if not we have a bug. What I mean is, if a window is between monitors, you should be able to cycle through it on either monitor, its canonical monitor being the one with the largest area of intersection. At the moment the window is arbitrarily bound to one of the monitors (you cannot tell which without focusing it), and can only be cycled through on that monitor. This is a symptom of the stack-per-monitor approach, which imo is a design flaw. Thanks, cls
